Skip to main content

Book Notes: Wikinomics

Just finished reading Wikinomics while on vacation in Vancouver and I wanted to dump out some book notes before I get too far into my next book and forget it all.

This was a good book, and one that actually reinforced a lot of what I already think and know about mass collaboration. The case studies in books like these usually never disappoint, and this book was no exception with great examples in Goldcorp, Dell and Innocentive.

Late in the book, the authors drop an incredible quote from Internet Pioneer Vint Cerf that really says it all. Paraphrased, "The 3 golden rules of the Internet are that nobody owns it, everybody users it and anyone can add services to it." It's obvious I know, but these rules mean fundamentally that the Internet is a totally new beast, something different than any preceding communications channel in history. Obvious I know, but still great stuff!

The 4 principles that the authors (Don Tapscott and Anthony Williams) outline are openness, peering, sharing and acting globally. Trust me, the book goes into great depth on these 4 principles.

Mass collaboration seems to be less about complex technology (how simple is a wiki after all?) but more about mindset and culture. It has been interesting to see how the different organizations I've worked in have embraced and/or rejected mass collaboration, and not because the technology was too hard. Even at Microsoft, there is sometimes an unwillingness to use Live Meeting and/or Groove for different reasons that don't ever seem to be technology related (perhaps surprisingly).

For those readers that think mass collaboration isn't a real force in the marketplace, consider that Amazon derives 30% of it's revenue from 3rd party resellers, or that P&G has an ambitious goal of finding 50% of all new innovations from outside the company. It's real, and mass collaboration isn't going away.

I always enjoy Tapscott's book and this was no exception. Highly recommended reading for proof that all this web 2.0, collaboration stuff is very, very real in the marketplace.

Updated a few hours later...
Looking at my notes, I realized I left out the most important part of these short book notes. The closing line in the book really summarizes things for me as I move forward as a mass collaboration proponent. "Is your mind ready for wikinomics?" It seems like a trite question that plays off the title of the book. But I think the authors very specifically and intentionally left this signpost for us as a warning and a promise.

If your mind and your organizational culture isn't ready, wikinomics will be hard, if not impossible to work well, if at all.


Popular posts from this blog

What Would Google Do: Non-Profit Edition

I've been tweeting and yapping to friends about Jeff Jarvis's terrific book " What Would Google Do " even before I've properly finishing the thing. I sat myself down tonight and plowed through the last 100 pages where Jarvis examines different industries including automotive, manufacturing, telcom, healthcare and more to see what Google would do if they were in those businesses. On one hand, I was really hoping that Jarvis had taken a look at the non-profit sector given my personal history in the sector and my ongoing interest in how non-profits operate. I'll also note that I used to write a fairly well read non-profit marketing blog . Unfortunately, the book doesn't delve into this much, if at all. I thought, instead of a basic set of notes or a book review as I usually do that I'd jump back in time and take a look at the sector with fresh, and "Googley" eyes. If you haven't yet read the book, the basic premise is that Google fundamen


I wrote a short piece on my LinkedIn page about transitioning to a startup called " Run !" Cross posting it here for archiving sake... I'm a huge fan of Zombie shows like The Walking Dead and it's new spinoff, Fear the Walking Dead. Running is a big part of being in a zombie apocalypse.  It turns out, running is also a bit part of working for a startup. After many years and several industries (non-profit, tech, consulting), I find myself back in what I call "startup land' - that magical place where chaos reigns and everyday brings a new set of challenges, each of which feels more important than the next. As it turns out, I thrive on that sort of chaos. Even when I was at PwC working as a consultant, the most interesting projects were the ones where there was total chaos. I'd look around and see everyone scrambling for cover and I'd just revel in the madness.  Now that I'm back in the thick of things working for a very small technology c

Betty Crocker

I was fortunate to be in Seattle this week and to get an invite to a Social Media Club meeting from my good friend Filiberto Selvas . Filiberto and I recently traded comments on SocialCRM blog and on Twitter about the idea of agencies running/managing online communities for brands. As per my usual, I started with a very strong opinion that brands who want to start customer communities should not use an agency for hands on community management. My entire concept of online communities revolves around creating open and honest conversations. The thought of hiring an agency to manage it to me at first seemed ludicrous. I felt strongly that any brand that would outsource that function ought to reconsider their strategy and perhaps hold off on building customer communities until they were more ready to commit. At the SMC meeting of course, I met someone with a different opinion (surprise, he's an agency guy!). Thing is, he mentioned Betty Crocker. According to Wikipedia, Betty Crocke